From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630DCBB9A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 10:47:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.173]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j9M8lNri006142 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 10:47:23 +0200 Received: from [212.227.126.160] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1ETF28-0003uU-00; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 10:47:20 +0200 Received: from [84.58.137.103] (helo=gate.lan.gerd-stolpmann.de) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1ETF28-0005wC-00; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 10:47:20 +0200 Received: from flakew.lan.gerd-stolpmann.de (flakew.lan.gerd-stolpmann.de [192.168.0.32]) by gate.lan.gerd-stolpmann.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0993EC0AD; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 10:47:20 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Duplicate functionality? From: Gerd Stolpmann To: Jon Harrop Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: <200510220431.18749.jon@ffconsultancy.com> References: <0IOQ006I7LO24OK2@vms044.mailsrvcs.net> <200510220431.18749.jon@ffconsultancy.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 10:47:19 +0200 Message-Id: <1129970839.27787.64.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:a6865a839c0178d9aa0ce41878507ea2 X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4359FC9B.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 gerd:01 stolpmann:01 ocaml:01 gerd:01 stolpmann:01 viktoriastr:01 64293:01 darmstadt:01 thesis:01 modules:01 tend:02 telefon:02 objects:02 module:03 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Am Samstag, den 22.10.2005, 04:31 +0100 schrieb Jon Harrop: > Consequently, OCaml programmers tend to prefer modules over objects where > possible. Once you get accustomed to the class system, which is definitely more complicated than the module system, this is no longer true. I'm the counterexample of your thesis. Gerd -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gerd Stolpmann * Viktoriastr. 45 * 64293 Darmstadt * Germany gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de http://www.gerd-stolpmann.de Telefon: 06151/153855 Telefax: 06151/997714 ------------------------------------------------------------