From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD4BD45F for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 01:05:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailx.valdosta.edu (mailx.valdosta.edu [168.18.130.251]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jA105DDc006246 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 01:05:14 +0100 Received: from blazemail.valdosta.edu (blazemail.valdosta.edu [168.18.130.208]) by mailx.valdosta.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA105DVB023444 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:05:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jtbryant@valdosta.edu) Received: from starlight.valdosta.edu (VO00985.valdosta.edu [168.18.148.146]) by blazemail.valdosta.edu (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.04 (built Feb 8 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IP900F8Y1KPTU@blazemail.valdosta.edu> for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:05:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:07:17 -0500 From: Jonathan Bryant Subject: Stdlib To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Reply-To: jtbryant@valdosta.edu Message-id: <1130803637.488.28.camel@starlight> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-17) Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-PMX-Version: 5.0.2.153301, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.3.2, Antispam-Data: 2005.10.31.30 X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4366B139.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; stdlib:01 stl:01 ocaml:01 lablgl:01 api:01 ocaml:01 syntax:01 stubs:01 intern:01 ohne:98 einfach:98 ein:98 ein:98 exile:98 unix:01 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Wow, guys. Thanks for the responses. That really cleared up my question :). I (unfortunately) have to learn some of the STL for another project and the thought occurred to me. On another note, I would love to do this other project in OCaml, but it is OpenGL intensive (read: based) and LablGL drives me nuts. The named argument thing drives me up the wall because it's more information that I don't want to have to learn and internalize. If the author of that package reads this list, then I apologize. You've done a fantastic job of mapping the API, but I really do not like the OCaml syntax for both Labeled and Optional arguments in general. Does anyone know of an OpenGL package that is /complete/ and /not/ labeled? There is, of course, the option of writing a module/set of modules that use the existing C stubs an are not labled, but that would be a last-ditch effort. Thanks! --Jonathan Bryant jtbryant@valdosta.edu Student Intern Unix System Operations VSU Information Technology "Das Leben ohne Music ist einfach ein Irrtum, eine Strapaze, ein" Exil." ("Life without music is simply an error, a pain, an exile.") --Frederich Nietzsche "The three cardinal values of a programmer are laziness, impatience, and hubris." --Perl Man Page