From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE25BB81 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 13:13:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jACCDAmM007114 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 13:13:10 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA16941 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 13:13:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jACCD7CN017898 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 13:13:09 +0100 Received: from rosella (ppp7-104.lns1.syd7.internode.on.net [59.167.7.104]) by smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jACCCtVX084413; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 22:43:02 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from skaller@users.sourceforge.net) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] strange behavior with record type definition From: skaller To: Florent Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <4375CAC8.5030803@aist.enst.fr> References: <43752259.80800@aist.enst.fr> <4375CAC8.5030803@aist.enst.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 23:12:55 +1100 Message-Id: <1131797575.18524.0.camel@rosella> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4375DC56.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4375DC53.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 wrote:01 sourceforge:01 expression:01 types:02 strange:07 definition:07 label:07 john:08 2005:91 felix:08 felix:08 differents:10 distinct:11 behavior:13 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 11:58 +0100, Florent wrote: > Mmhh, why do we have to use differents label names in distinct record > types ? So that the type of an expression: { x = 1; y = 2 } can be determined. -- John Skaller Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net