From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A58BB81 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:56:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jAIHuMLs004734 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:56:23 +0100 Received: from rosella (ppp7-104.lns1.syd7.internode.on.net [59.167.7.104]) by smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jAIHuD2m056742; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 04:26:14 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from skaller@users.sourceforge.net) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocamlyacc -- can i tell it to be quiet? From: skaller To: padator@wanadoo.fr Cc: Sebastian Egner , caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: <29147408.1132331685551.JavaMail.www@wwinf1532> References: <29147408.1132331685551.JavaMail.www@wwinf1532> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 04:56:13 +1100 Message-Id: <1132336573.10869.86.camel@rosella> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 437E15C6.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocamlyacc:01 grammar:01 const:01 extern:01 grammar:01 syntax:01 ocaml:01 haskell:01 wrote:01 sourceforge:01 btw:02 talks:03 talks:03 explanation:03 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 17:34 +0100, yoann padioleau wrote: > > > > > BTW, I dont know if your grammar talks about C, but in C you can even write > > > "long const extern long a;" > > > > The grammar in question is the Felix grammar, which is a kind > > of hybrid syntax between C++ and ML. It make no pretense > > of being an upgrade of C++ syntactically .. however I do > > try to keep enough familiar things in it that it won't > > be quite as scary as Ocaml or Haskell. > > You should put a around such statements :) > > Did you intentionnaly post your previous message to be able to get > more attention on felix :) Nope. It is more by way of explanation. You said "I don't know if your grammar talks about C ..", and I explained the context. -- John Skaller Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net