From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABDFABB9C for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:03:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jAUJ3ees008247 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:03:40 +0100 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA17395 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:03:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from lynndie.uscs.susx.ac.uk (lynndie.uscs.susx.ac.uk [139.184.14.87]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jAUJ3bM2008243 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:03:37 +0100 Received: from calaf.rn.informatics.scitech.susx.ac.uk ([139.184.48.199]:58243) by lynndie.uscs.susx.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id IQS7M1-00079G-3W for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:03:37 +0000 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Support for 64bit Pentium? From: David Teller Reply-To: David.Teller@ens-lyon.org To: Ocaml In-Reply-To: <1133376550.15904.2.camel@shadowdb.qualcomm.com> References: <438DF00B.9030700@barettadeit.com> <1133376550.15904.2.camel@shadowdb.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:03:33 +0000 Message-Id: <1133377413.18518.49.camel@calaf.rn.informatics.scitech.susx.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-22) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 438DF78C.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 438DF789.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ens-lyon:01 cheers:01 caml-list:01 beginner's:01 ocaml:01 beginners:01 bug:01 wrote:01 bin:01 essentially:01 caml:02 caml:02 archives:02 caml-bugs:02 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Haven't they actually licensed AMD's processor and renamed it ? Cheers, David On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 10:49 -0800, David Brown wrote: > They are identical, at least from a user-program perspective. Intel > tries very hard to downplay this, since they've essentially reversed > positions, and have themselves cloned AMD's features. > > Dave Brown > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs -- Read, write and publish e-books, Free software, Open standards, Open source, The OpenBerg project -- http://www.openberg.org