From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cmdkeen@gmx.de>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_FAIL 
	autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB92BC0B
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:34:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l0PMYU7h008441
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:34:30 +0100
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2007 22:34:26 -0000
Received: from e178066121.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO [192.168.2.182]) [85.178.66.121]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 25 Jan 2007 23:34:26 +0100
X-Authenticated: #6007662
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
In-Reply-To: <200701250247.39780.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
References: <6dbd4d000701221854v1fa172a9k59c0023e382fb2a7@mail.gmail.com> <20070124215329.GA31041@efil.de> <6dbd4d000701241832n40cfd1b8p40fa2300699e086d@mail.gmail.com> <200701250247.39780.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <1135D43F-2E89-4D88-B38D-D3A16933739D@gmx.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jan Rehders <cmdkeen@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Exception backtraces
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:37:09 +0100
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 45B93076.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)!
X-Spam: no; 0.00; bytecode:01 camlparam:01 toplevel:01 ocaml:01 bytecode:01 compiler:01 25.:98 2007,:98 wrote:01 wrote:01 exception:01 caml-list:01 compiling:02 applied:04 specify:06 

On 25. Jan 2007, at 03:47, Jon Harrop wrote:
> On Thursday 25 January 2007 02:32, Denis Bueno wrote:
>> I did see that, but, since I'm compiling into bytecode (which,
>> granted, I did not specify), I didn't think it applied to me. In any
>> event, it doesn't specify how exactly to *get* backtraces (apart from
>> OCAMLPARAM="b")
>
> Can you explain what you want that CAMLPARAM=b does not provide?

Is it possible to get backtraces for the toplevel? I've tried to do  
it similar to the solution for the ocaml bytecode compiler but had no  
luck

-- Jan R.