From: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>
Cc: padator@wanadoo.fr, Asfand Yar Qazi <email@asfandyar.cjb.net>,
caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] STM support in OCaml
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 23:04:56 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1141819496.20944.534.camel@budgie.wigram> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1141817549.10771.63.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 12:32 +0100, Gerd Stolpmann wrote:
> Anyway, I think this question is misleading. The point is not to
> establish locking schemes that use the hardware better (i.e. that are
> faster), but to help programmers writing correct code.
My aim would be to do both -- they're not independent.
Who cares about concurrency if not to try to do some job faster?
And of course it's no good if you do the wrong thing faster :)
--
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sourceforge dot net>
Async PL, Realtime software consultants
Checkout Felix: http://felix.sourceforge.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-08 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-08 10:11 yoann padioleau
2006-03-08 10:41 ` Asfand Yar Qazi
2006-03-08 12:23 ` skaller
2006-03-08 23:02 ` Asfand Yar Qazi
2006-03-09 0:36 ` skaller
2006-03-08 11:32 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2006-03-08 12:04 ` skaller [this message]
2006-03-08 19:22 ` Dan Grossman
2006-03-08 22:10 ` skaller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-07 16:18 Asfand Yar Qazi
2006-03-07 16:50 ` [Caml-list] " Sebastian Egner
2006-03-07 17:44 ` Michael Hicks
2006-03-08 0:37 ` Asfand Yar Qazi
2006-03-08 5:05 ` Erick Tryzelaar
2006-03-07 17:15 ` skaller
2006-03-07 19:05 ` Asfand Yar Qazi
2006-03-08 0:52 ` skaller
2006-03-08 10:38 ` Asfand Yar Qazi
2006-03-08 19:36 ` William Lovas
2006-03-08 20:45 ` Brian Hurt
2006-03-08 21:14 ` Paul Snively
2006-03-08 22:06 ` skaller
2006-03-08 22:10 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2006-03-08 23:48 ` skaller
2006-03-09 7:45 ` Andrae Muys
2006-03-09 9:18 ` David Brown
2006-03-08 22:11 ` Brian Hurt
2006-03-08 23:05 ` Lodewijk Vöge
2006-03-09 3:13 ` Brian Hurt
2006-03-08 23:45 ` Robert Roessler
2006-03-09 0:23 ` skaller
2006-03-09 3:19 ` Brian Hurt
2006-03-09 4:32 ` skaller
2006-03-09 10:38 ` John Chu
2006-03-11 15:26 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1141819496.20944.534.camel@budgie.wigram \
--to=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=email@asfandyar.cjb.net \
--cc=info@gerd-stolpmann.de \
--cc=padator@wanadoo.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).