From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD1EBB84 for ; Sat, 20 May 2006 14:02:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k4KC2IXK004919 for ; Sat, 20 May 2006 14:02:18 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA06140 for ; Sat, 20 May 2006 14:02:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k4KC2G9T023632 for ; Sat, 20 May 2006 14:02:17 +0200 Received: from rosella (ppp28-237.lns1.syd6.internode.on.net [59.167.28.237]) by smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k4KC2EKM094256; Sat, 20 May 2006 21:32:15 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from skaller@users.sourceforge.net) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Array 4 MB size limit From: skaller To: Jozef Kosoru Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <20060520110645.GD32550@osiris.uid0.sk> References: <20060515141230.ajyupn2z28k0484s@horde.akalin.cx> <446986DF.1070308@inria.fr> <446D5E4A.8060005@akalin.cx> <20060519162844.GA32550@osiris.uid0.sk> <20060520090826.GB32550@osiris.uid0.sk> <1148119942.8693.18.camel@rosella.wigram> <20060520110645.GD32550@osiris.uid0.sk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 22:02:14 +1000 Message-Id: <1148126534.8693.118.camel@rosella.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 446F054A.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 446F0548.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; 2006:98 wrote:01 sourceforge:01 caml-list:01 generally:03 size:95 long:05 migration:06 felix:08 felix:08 john:08 i'm:08 think:11 things:13 successor:13 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 13:06 +0200, Jozef Kosoru wrote: > > > It surely will not be 20 years. > > I think the migration from 64-bit to 128-bit architecture will take more > than 20 years. But such things are generally very hard to predict. I'm not disputing that -- I was asking how long it will take until we have 4-core CPU chips in commercial quantities for desktops. -- John Skaller Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net