From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFEEEBB84 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 03:24:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k4L1On4J023084 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 03:24:49 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA15915 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 03:24:49 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k4L1Okeh023077 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 03:24:48 +0200 Received: from rosella (ppp28-237.lns1.syd6.internode.on.net [59.167.28.237]) by smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k4L1OY4p087510; Sun, 21 May 2006 10:54:36 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from skaller@users.sourceforge.net) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Array 4 MB size limit From: skaller To: Oliver Bandel Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <20060520214208.GD2670@first.in-berlin.de> References: <20060515141230.ajyupn2z28k0484s@horde.akalin.cx> <446986DF.1070308@inria.fr> <446D5E4A.8060005@akalin.cx> <20060519162844.GA32550@osiris.uid0.sk> <20060520090826.GB32550@osiris.uid0.sk> <1148119942.8693.18.camel@rosella.wigram> <20060520214208.GD2670@first.in-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 11:24:34 +1000 Message-Id: <1148174674.12058.36.camel@rosella.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 446FC161.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 446FC15E.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bandel:01 2006:98 20,:98 2006:98 wrote:01 wrote:01 sourceforge:01 caml-list:01 oliver:01 size:95 core:08 felix:08 felix:08 john:08 though:11 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 23:42 +0200, Oliver Bandel wrote: > On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 08:12:22PM +1000, skaller wrote: > Two dual core G5: > > http://www.apple.com/powermac/ We're looking at how N will increase in N-core CPU chips. There are plenty of boards that support multiple CPUs (you can get a 8x Opteron board, that's 16 cores, and not really that expensive -- the CPUs are though :). 'In theory' CISC should die, RISC should support higher N on the same wafer. -- John Skaller Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net