From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F0FBB84 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 03:26:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k4L1Q7fM014272 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 03:26:07 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA11138 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 03:26:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k4L1Q4ec023270 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 03:26:05 +0200 Received: from rosella (ppp28-237.lns1.syd6.internode.on.net [59.167.28.237]) by smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k4L1Pw9k040920; Sun, 21 May 2006 10:55:59 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from skaller@users.sourceforge.net) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Array 4 MB size limit From: skaller To: Oliver Bandel Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <20060520221530.GG2670@first.in-berlin.de> References: <6C6555DF5D075A4EA6D27706F4EC59750568C865@EUR-MSG-10.europe.corp.microsoft.com> <20060520221530.GG2670@first.in-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 11:25:58 +1000 Message-Id: <1148174758.12058.38.camel@rosella.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 446FC1AF.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 446FC1AC.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bandel:01 syme:01 2006:98 20,:98 2006:98 wrote:01 wrote:01 sourceforge:01 caml-list:01 oliver:01 seems:03 unlikely:04 size:95 linux:06 quite:06 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 00:15 +0200, Oliver Bandel wrote: > On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:15:52PM +0100, Don Syme wrote: > > > > > And Microsoft seems to be incapable of releasing a > > > new OS- 32-bit or 64-bit. > > > > 64-bit editions of Windows XP and Windows 2003 Server have been > > available for quite a while, e.g. > > What is Windows? :-> The dominant desktop platform. Linux is unlikely to challenge it. Apple might. -- John Skaller Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net