From: Carlos Pita <cpitaper@yahoo.com.ar>
To: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why + vs +. but "fake" parametric polymorphism for <
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 02:58:57 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1160632737.7649.34.camel@monad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061012.144518.115907516.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
> Of course there is an overhead. But the compiler is clever enough to
> remove this overhead when the types of arguments are statically known.
> In particular this is true for floats.
Oh, I see, so if I understand you it would be enough if I use an integer
literal somewhere or explicitly declare some variable as int so the
compiler can infer that the particular use of the comparison operator is
being passed integer operands and consequently inline an specific,
optimized-for-int, version of <. Am I wrong?
Cheers,
Carlos
__________________________________________________
Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí.
Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas,
está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta).
¡Probalo ya!
http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-12 5:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-12 5:18 Carlos Pita
2006-10-12 5:45 ` [Caml-list] " Jacques Garrigue
2006-10-12 5:58 ` Carlos Pita [this message]
2006-10-12 6:08 ` Jonathan Roewen
[not found] ` <452DF46C.802@fmf.uni-lj.si>
2006-10-12 14:26 ` Carlos Pita
2006-10-13 11:56 ` Diego Olivier FERNANDEZ PONS
2006-10-13 12:14 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2006-10-13 12:46 ` Diego Olivier FERNANDEZ PONS
2006-10-13 13:01 ` Luc Maranget
2006-10-13 13:15 ` Diego Olivier FERNANDEZ PONS
2006-10-13 13:15 ` skaller
2006-10-13 13:36 ` Luc Maranget
2006-10-13 13:53 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2006-10-13 14:16 ` Luc Maranget
2006-10-12 5:19 Carlos Pita
2006-10-12 5:41 ` [Caml-list] " Carlos Pita
2006-10-12 5:49 ` Basile STARYNKEVITCH
2006-10-12 5:53 ` Jonathan Roewen
2006-10-12 6:10 ` Carlos Pita
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1160632737.7649.34.camel@monad \
--to=cpitaper@yahoo.com.ar \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).