From: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Scripting in ocaml
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 14:30:04 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1166931004.25424.35.camel@rosella.wigram> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200612231850.04578.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
On Sat, 2006-12-23 at 18:50 +0000, Jon Harrop wrote:
> What do you mean by "run-time static analysis"? Surely if something is
> analysed at run-time then it cannot be static by definition?
Run time control flow analysis analysing invariant code blocks,
so you could say it is 'run time static analysis' because
it is done at run time, but analysing stuff which is 'static' :)
A JIT interpreter might do such stuff.
I guess this what was intended?
--
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-24 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-21 3:41 Denis Bueno
2006-12-21 4:34 ` [Caml-list] " Erik de Castro Lopo
2006-12-21 7:22 ` skaller
2006-12-21 9:12 ` Till Varoquaux
2006-12-21 9:18 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-21 10:29 ` skaller
2006-12-21 20:21 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-21 13:30 ` Serge Aleynikov
2006-12-21 13:52 ` skaller
2006-12-21 14:59 ` Serge Aleynikov
2006-12-21 20:25 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-21 20:41 ` Daniel Bünzli
2006-12-21 22:16 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-22 12:21 ` strong/weak typing terminology (was Re: [Caml-list] Scripting in ocaml) Daniel Bünzli
2006-12-22 16:51 ` Tom
2006-12-22 17:34 ` Daniel Bünzli
2006-12-22 18:16 ` skaller
2006-12-22 18:47 ` Daniel Bünzli
2006-12-22 19:42 ` skaller
2006-12-22 20:03 ` David Brown
2006-12-22 20:17 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-23 3:48 ` skaller
2006-12-23 4:11 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-22 20:19 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-23 12:58 ` Daniel Bünzli
2006-12-23 16:06 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-23 21:50 ` Tom
2006-12-26 6:10 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-22 20:14 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-21 21:11 ` [Caml-list] Scripting in ocaml Serge Aleynikov
2006-12-21 21:27 ` Philippe Wang
2006-12-21 22:06 ` Serge Aleynikov
2006-12-22 12:35 ` Jon Harrop
2006-12-21 22:19 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-22 12:37 ` Jon Harrop
2006-12-22 18:52 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-22 2:51 ` skaller
2006-12-22 15:20 ` Jon Harrop
2006-12-22 11:32 ` Jon Harrop
2006-12-23 18:50 ` Jon Harrop
2006-12-24 0:15 ` Serge Aleynikov
2006-12-24 3:30 ` skaller [this message]
2006-12-21 14:59 ` Richard Jones
2006-12-21 20:27 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-21 23:35 ` Martin Jambon
2006-12-26 17:14 ` Aleksey Nogin
2006-12-26 23:36 ` Ian Zimmerman
2006-12-27 18:25 ` Aleksey Nogin
2006-12-27 18:39 ` Richard Jones
2006-12-27 19:20 ` Aleksey Nogin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1166931004.25424.35.camel@rosella.wigram \
--to=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=jon@ffconsultancy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).