From: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Vincent Hanquez <tab@snarc.org>
Cc: Martin Jambon <martin.jambon@ens-lyon.org>, caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml compiler features
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:18:11 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1168910291.9207.62.camel@rosella.wigram> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070115221717.GA9982@snarc.org>
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 23:17 +0100, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 12:23:32PM -0800, Martin Jambon wrote:
> > OCaml is well-enough designed so that there is no "common" syntax
> > extension.
>
> There ARE common syntax extensions.
> how many people miss a try-except-finally construct ?
> how many people miss a return statement to break the flow of a function.
> etc ..
I don't miss any of those things .. the point being they're
not so 'common' as you might think.
I'm a Python programmer too, and I never use 'finally' ..
I've never found any use for it.
Felix has return statement .. but then Felix has *statements*:
executable Ocaml is all expressions, so a return statement would
seem out of place.
> I'm not talking about weird extensions that ease the life of grammar
> writter or lambda calculus , etc .. but really the basic one.
One man's nice extensions are weird to another. Many parts of
Ocaml are weird (IMHO :) but at least its a shared weirdness.
--
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-16 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-13 5:37 Edgar Friendly
2007-01-13 5:56 ` [Caml-list] " Tom
2007-01-14 17:35 ` Edgar Friendly
2007-01-14 17:59 ` ketty
2007-01-14 18:21 ` Edgar Friendly
2007-01-14 18:29 ` Jon Harrop
2007-01-13 7:41 ` David Baelde
2007-01-13 9:31 ` ketty
2007-01-14 17:33 ` Edgar Friendly
2007-01-14 18:23 ` Jon Harrop
2007-01-14 18:41 ` Vincent Hanquez
2007-01-14 20:49 ` Jon Harrop
2007-01-14 23:38 ` Gabriel Kerneis
2007-01-15 0:55 ` Jon Harrop
2007-01-15 6:12 ` skaller
2007-01-15 0:05 ` Vincent Hanquez
2007-01-15 5:59 ` skaller
2007-01-15 20:23 ` Martin Jambon
2007-01-15 21:30 ` Jon Harrop
2007-01-15 22:13 ` Try finally (was Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml compiler features) Daniel Bünzli
2007-01-15 22:27 ` Vincent Hanquez
2007-01-15 22:40 ` Quôc Peyrot
2007-01-15 23:08 ` Vincent Hanquez
2007-01-15 22:17 ` [Caml-list] Ocaml compiler features Vincent Hanquez
2007-01-16 1:18 ` skaller [this message]
2007-01-16 2:11 ` Jon Harrop
2007-01-16 5:18 ` Edgar Friendly
2007-01-16 6:36 ` skaller
2007-01-16 6:33 ` skaller
2007-01-16 13:55 ` Brian Hurt
2007-01-16 9:00 ` Vincent Hanquez
2007-01-16 14:14 ` skaller
2007-01-16 15:00 ` Vincent Hanquez
2007-01-16 17:47 ` skaller
2007-01-16 19:24 ` Edgar Friendly
2007-01-17 3:28 ` skaller
2007-01-17 11:41 ` Vincent Hanquez
2007-01-17 12:53 ` Olivier Andrieu
2007-01-17 13:18 ` Vincent Hanquez
2007-01-17 14:09 ` skaller
2007-01-16 19:42 ` Jon Harrop
2007-01-16 21:15 ` Florian Weimer
2007-01-17 3:46 ` skaller
2007-01-17 11:50 ` Vincent Hanquez
2007-01-15 5:56 ` skaller
2007-01-15 9:35 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2007-01-15 18:28 ` Martin Jambon
2007-01-15 19:02 ` ls-ocaml-developer-2006
2007-01-14 19:01 ` Edgar Friendly
2007-01-14 18:51 ` Vincent Hanquez
2007-01-14 20:49 ` Jon Harrop
2007-01-15 0:19 ` Vincent Hanquez
2007-01-20 19:19 ` Jon Harrop
2007-01-20 21:40 ` skaller
2007-01-14 21:47 ` Tom
2007-01-15 10:36 ` Richard Jones
2007-01-15 14:24 ` Vincent Hanquez
2007-01-16 8:45 ` Hendrik Tews
2007-01-16 9:08 ` Vincent Hanquez
2007-01-21 17:07 ` [Caml-list] native-code stack backtraces (was: Ocaml compiler features) Xavier Leroy
2007-01-21 18:53 ` Pierre Etchemaïté
2007-01-16 5:21 ` [Caml-list] Ocaml compiler features Edgar Friendly
2007-01-16 5:33 ` ketty
2007-01-16 6:00 ` Edgar Friendly
2007-01-16 6:10 ` ketty
2007-01-16 5:55 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2007-01-16 17:51 ` Edgar Friendly
2007-01-16 19:09 ` Jon Harrop
2007-01-16 19:21 ` Brian Hurt
2007-01-16 20:06 ` Jonathan Roewen
2007-01-16 20:13 ` Florian Weimer
2007-01-16 6:51 ` skaller
2007-01-16 18:01 ` Edgar Friendly
2007-01-17 2:23 ` skaller
2007-01-16 8:00 ` Florian Hars
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1168910291.9207.62.camel@rosella.wigram \
--to=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=martin.jambon@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=tab@snarc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).