From: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
To: "Seth J. Fogarty" <sfogarty@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Polymorphic Variants
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:55:09 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1169013309.8941.99.camel@rosella.wigram> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7ee61120701161323r4bd66f35sd1d7c6253431bcdd@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 15:23 -0600, Seth J. Fogarty wrote:
> OCaml does not, as far as I know, have any structural typing for
> records..
Hmm .. Felix does, and it supports subtyping (by explicit coercion).
So why doesn't Ocaml have it? Yes, it would be "yet another product
type", bringing the total to 4 in Ocaml (tuples, records, structurally
typed records and classes).
Come to think of it .. aren't classes structurally typed records?
--
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-17 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-16 20:32 Tom
2007-01-16 20:49 ` [Caml-list] " Seth J. Fogarty
2007-01-16 21:05 ` Tom
2007-01-16 21:23 ` Seth J. Fogarty
2007-01-16 21:45 ` Edgar Friendly
2007-01-16 22:18 ` Lukasz Stafiniak
2007-01-17 5:55 ` skaller [this message]
2007-01-17 0:30 ` Jonathan Roewen
2007-01-17 2:19 ` Jacques GARRIGUE
2007-01-17 3:24 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2007-01-18 2:12 ` Jacques Garrigue
2007-01-17 6:09 ` skaller
2007-01-17 13:34 ` Andrej Bauer
2007-01-17 21:13 ` Tom
2007-01-17 22:53 ` Jon Harrop
2007-01-17 23:07 ` Tom
[not found] ` <200701172349.53331.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
[not found] ` <c1490a380701180407j670a7cccyb679c71fde20aa4b@mail.gmail.com>
2007-01-18 16:23 ` Fwd: " Tom
2007-01-18 21:14 ` Jon Harrop
2007-01-19 9:26 ` Dirk Thierbach
2007-01-19 10:35 ` Tom
2007-01-19 11:14 ` Dirk Thierbach
2007-01-19 12:03 ` Tom
2007-01-18 21:43 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2007-01-18 1:28 ` Jacques Garrigue
2007-01-18 1:46 ` Jon Harrop
2007-01-18 4:05 ` skaller
2007-01-18 6:20 ` Jacques Garrigue
2007-01-18 9:48 ` skaller
2007-01-18 12:23 ` Tom
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-17 9:49 [Caml-list] Polymorphic variants John Max Skaller
2002-04-17 10:43 ` Remi VANICAT
2002-04-17 23:49 ` John Max Skaller
2002-04-18 1:23 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-04-18 9:04 ` John Max Skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1169013309.8941.99.camel@rosella.wigram \
--to=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=sfogarty@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).