From: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Jim Miller <gordon.j.miller@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Interactive technical computing
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:27:11 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1173324431.12230.94.camel@rosella.wigram> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <beed19130703071919g1f537f59o93ce06871fba8f3a@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 22:19 -0500, Jim Miller wrote:
> Ah, I misunderstood ...
>
> I would say that with the researchers I know of and work with, the
> answer would be no. $5K these days is a lot of money for most of the
> scientists I'm working with, to the point that they're actually using
> Octave and R (free) and moving away from buying their analysis
> packages.
So how about $500? I just picked a random number out of the air.
Don't forget .. the general framework Harrop describes isn't
restricted to the science market, certainly not just atmospherics.
Although with the current hype about global warming, atmospheric
modelling might get additional funds pumped in .. :)
--
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-08 3:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-08 1:13 Jon Harrop
2007-03-08 1:49 ` [Caml-list] " Jim Miller
2007-03-08 2:52 ` skaller
2007-03-08 3:00 ` Jim Miller
2007-03-08 3:10 ` skaller
[not found] ` <beed19130703071919g1f537f59o93ce06871fba8f3a@mail.gmail.com>
2007-03-08 3:27 ` skaller [this message]
2007-03-08 3:36 ` Jim Miller
2007-03-08 21:16 ` Richard Jones
[not found] ` <45F10E90.5000707@laposte.net>
2007-03-09 7:43 ` Matthieu Dubuget
2007-03-10 14:58 ` Richard Jones
2007-03-08 12:22 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2007-03-08 14:24 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2007-03-08 19:34 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-08 20:34 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2007-03-09 10:22 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 10:45 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2007-03-08 2:12 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2007-03-08 12:41 ` [Caml-list] F# Jon Harrop
2007-03-08 11:12 ` [Caml-list] Interactive technical computing Andrej Bauer
2007-03-08 11:59 ` Vu Ngoc San
2007-03-08 12:43 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-08 21:28 ` Vu Ngoc San
2007-03-09 0:14 ` skaller
2007-03-08 21:26 Robert Fischer
2007-03-09 0:04 ` skaller
2007-03-09 10:06 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 10:25 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-10 14:55 ` Richard Jones
2007-03-10 22:07 ` Michael Vanier
2007-03-29 0:33 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-29 8:41 ` Joel Reymont
2007-03-30 11:31 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 13:33 Robert Fischer
2007-03-09 13:49 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 13:54 ` skaller
2007-03-09 14:13 Robert Fischer
2007-03-09 15:21 ` skaller
2007-03-09 17:26 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 18:50 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 14:21 Robert Fischer
2007-03-09 15:35 Robert Fischer
2007-03-09 17:41 Robert Fischer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1173324431.12230.94.camel@rosella.wigram \
--to=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=gordon.j.miller@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).