From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B82BCA6 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:19:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.135]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l29BJkum031908 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:19:47 +0100 Received: from ppp19-103.lns2.syd7.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.201]) ([59.167.19.103]) by ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2007 21:49:45 +1030 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.14,267,1170595800"; d="scan'208"; a="60346372:sNHT21274498" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] proposed extenion to patterns From: skaller To: Jon Harrop Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: <200703091008.03855.jon@ffconsultancy.com> References: <1173405721.9499.13.camel@rosella.wigram> <200703091008.03855.jon@ffconsultancy.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:19:41 +1100 Message-Id: <1173439181.22738.28.camel@rosella.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 45F142D2.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; model:01 sourceforge:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 fri:05 proposals:05 proposals:05 i'd:05 bottom:93 long:06 rather:08 john:09 felix:09 felix:09 On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 10:08 +0000, Jon Harrop wrote: > On Friday 09 March 2007 02:02, skaller wrote: > > Any comments on this idea? > > Every now and again I want that, but I think there are much bigger gains to be > had elsewhere Agreed. > and I'd rather those were addressed first. Development in sequence of importance isn't the only model. When working with Stroustrup and the C++ extensions subgroup, on the (long list) of proposals, we'd vote. Then we'd deal with the 3 proposals at the top of the list -- and the three at the bottom :) -- John Skaller Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net