From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B27FBC69 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 03:12:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.140]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3D1CjrL013096 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 03:12:47 +0200 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.14,405,1170595800"; d="scan'208";a="114115838" Received: from ppp8-148.lns1.syd7.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.201]) ([59.167.8.148]) by ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 13 Apr 2007 10:42:32 +0930 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Example slowing down... (OpenGL/lablgl) From: skaller To: Jon Harrop Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: <200704122046.18632.jon@ffconsultancy.com> References: <20070411222521.GA1603@first.in-berlin.de> <200704120815.24433.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <20070412143329.GB396@first.in-berlin.de> <200704122046.18632.jon@ffconsultancy.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:12:16 +1000 Message-Id: <1176426736.12702.49.camel@rosella.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 461ED90D.003 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; lablgl:01 0100,:01 ackermann:01 ocamlopt:01 ocamlopt:01 rankings:98 2.40:98 0.30:98 0.59:98 sourceforge:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 opengl:02 guess:04 thu:05 On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 20:46 +0100, Jon Harrop wrote: > I doubt you will need to. There is very little that will run faster in C these > days. Calculating ackermann(3,y): Rankings for ack on rosella, amd64x1 1G,ubuntu: processor: y secs samples, deviation felix 13 5.51 [N= 3 SD= 2%] gnat 13 9.59 [N= 1 SD= 0%] gccopt 13 9.84 [N= 2 SD= 0%] ocamlopt 13 13.76 [N= 3 SD= 0%] felix 12 1.23 [N= 10 SD= 0%] gccopt 12 2.37 [N= 6 SD= 0%] gnat 12 2.40 [N= 9 SD= 0%] ocamlopt 12 2.47 [N= 7 SD= 0%] felix 11 0.30 [N= 3 SD= 0%] gccopt 11 0.59 [N= 11 SD= 0%] Lucky register allocation I guess .. :) -- John Skaller Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net