From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3948ABC69 for ; Sun, 6 May 2007 23:25:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.140]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l46LPGk6025982 for ; Sun, 6 May 2007 23:25:17 +0200 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.14,500,1170595800"; d="scan'208";a="124026388" Received: from ppp8-148.lns1.syd7.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.201]) ([59.167.8.148]) by ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 07 May 2007 06:55:15 +0930 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] 246 constructors? From: skaller To: Brian Hurt Cc: "caml-list@inria.fr" In-Reply-To: References: <1178480953.4443.4.camel@rosella.wigram> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 07:25:13 +1000 Message-Id: <1178486713.4443.25.camel@rosella.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 463E47BC.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; constructors:01 sourceforge:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 brian:04 implement:06 blocks:07 john:09 felix:09 felix:09 although:09 difficult:12 think:12 idea:12 tag:13 On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 17:11 -0400, Brian Hurt wrote: > I think a better solution, although I have no idea how difficult it'd be > to implement, would be "large tag blocks". [] That sounds like a good plan! -- John Skaller Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net