From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06C4BC0A for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 14:35:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dedibox1.ambre.net (dedibox1.ambre.net [88.191.29.66]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l4ICZtHN024241 for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 14:35:55 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.5] (unknown [81.185.97.179]) by dedibox1.ambre.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1299114C14E; Fri, 18 May 2007 14:35:50 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] labltk for tk 8.4 BETA release From: David Teller To: Richard Jones Cc: OCaml In-Reply-To: <20070515080847.GA30352@furbychan.cocan.org> References: <1179179330.6092.17.camel@Blefuscu> <20070515080847.GA30352@furbychan.cocan.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:35:49 +0200 Message-Id: <1179491749.5845.25.camel@Blefuscu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 464D9DAB.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; labltk:01 ens-lyon:01 0100,:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 semantics:01 cheers:01 selections:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 data:02 data:02 structures:02 primitive:02 structure:06 On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 09:08 +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > > I'm currently thinking about the best way to write the equivalent of > > JavaFX for OCaml : both the user-interface and the "new features" (e.g. > > list comprehension, SQL-ish selections from data structures, etc.). The > > user-interface part doesn't look too difficult. I'll start to work on > > it... well, if I ever get time. > > PG'OCaml does the SQL part: http://merjis.com/developers/pgocaml Actually, it doesn't. What I'm talking about is applying SELECT to a OCaml (or, in that case, Java) data structure, not to a SQL database. I'm not completely clear about the semantics of the primitive, but it does look interesting. Cheers, David