From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A74BC0A for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:00:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.135]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5DE0DFX004458 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:00:15 +0200 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.16,417,1175437800"; d="scan'208";a="102596526" Received: from ppp2-129.lns1.syd7.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.201]) ([59.167.2.129]) by ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 13 Jun 2007 23:30:12 +0930 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] cywgin stack overflow From: skaller To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Cc: Rhythmic Fistman , Emmanuel Onzon In-Reply-To: References: <1181720072.23474.13.camel@rosella.wigram> <1181738340.6135.6.camel@rosella.wigram> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:00:09 +1000 Message-Id: <1181743209.6135.13.camel@rosella.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 466FF86E.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; stack:01 ocaml:01 cygwin:01 cygwin:01 ocaml:01 compiler:01 stack:01 3.08:01 allocates:01 compilation:01 strace:01 sourceforge:01 wrote:01 stacks:01 caml-list:01 On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 09:44 -0400, Igor Peshansky wrote: > > Unfortunately, recompiling Ocaml on Cygwin isn't an option. > > Is there someone here maintaining the Cygwin port? > > Yes. I am. Ah, good! Thanks! > > Any chance of 3.09 series Ocaml, and, with the native > > code compiler built with a larger stack? > I thought Ocaml had growable stacks... I must've been confused. I have no idea how it works. > Besides, I'm planning to build a 3.10 series shortly -- is there really a > pressing need for 3.09? I think my project should build with 3.08 up, so no pressing need for 3.09 here. > Do try to increase the available memory -- the amount Cygwin allocates by > default is rather small (256M, I believe). Another possibility is to run > the compilation under strace to see why it exits. Yes, I can try that .. a bit messy (dual booting, I lose all the email with nice info like this when running Cygwin). -- John Skaller Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net