From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A75ABC6C for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:28:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.135]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l63FSLdX031428 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:28:23 +0200 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.16,492,1175437800"; d="scan'208";a="111028798" Received: from ppp121-44-3-31.lns4.syd7.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.201]) ([121.44.3.31]) by ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 04 Jul 2007 00:58:17 +0930 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Incremental, undoable parsing in OCaml as the general parser inversion From: skaller To: oleg@pobox.com Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <20070703113836.2317EAD43@Adric.metnet.fnmoc.navy.mil> References: <20070703113836.2317EAD43@Adric.metnet.fnmoc.navy.mil> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 01:28:16 +1000 Message-Id: <1183476496.6252.20.camel@rosella.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 468A6B15.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 parser:01 oleg:01 ocaml:01 parser:01 ocamlyacc:01 sourceforge:01 parsing:01 parsing:01 incremental:01 incremental:01 wrote:01 invert:01 caml-list:01 essentially:02 On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 04:38 -0700, oleg@pobox.com wrote: > This message is to show that the incremental parsing in OCaml is a > solved problem -- essentially for any parser. Hmm .. I'm afraid I don't understand. If i have an Ocamlyacc parser function f .. how do I control invert it? -- John Skaller Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net