From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13588BC6B; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:05:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.135]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l6AD5gNJ002774; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:05:43 +0200 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.16,522,1175437800"; d="scan'208";a="114190731" Received: from ppp121-44-3-31.lns4.syd7.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.201]) ([121.44.3.31]) by ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 10 Jul 2007 22:35:40 +0930 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4s 4.02 From: skaller To: Daniel de Rauglaudre Cc: Caml List In-Reply-To: <20070710111329.GA7621@yquem.inria.fr> References: <20070709094028.GB9408@yquem.inria.fr> <1183980485.26391.15.camel@rosella.wigram> <20070710083344.GA9032@yquem.inria.fr> <1184058519.14689.8.camel@rosella.wigram> <20070710111329.GA7621@yquem.inria.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:05:38 +1000 Message-Id: <1184072738.14689.34.camel@rosella.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 46938426.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; camlp:01 0200,:01 rauglaudre:01 camlp:01 bytecode:01 ocamlc:01 ocamlopt:01 sourceforge:01 wrote:01 compile:01 preprocessor:01 preprocessor:01 caml-list:01 native:02 daniel:04 On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 13:13 +0200, Daniel de Rauglaudre wrote: > It cannot be native code, because camlp4 uses only bytecode, and > the "#load" being done in the preprocessor, there is no difference > whether you compile your file by ocamlc or ocamlopt. > This "#load" does not mean "load in the program" but "load in the > preprocessor". My point exactly. I don't use any pre-processor, so the #load doesn't work. -- John Skaller Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net