From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E094EBC6B for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:58:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.135]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l6AFw47U015038 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:58:06 +0200 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.16,523,1175437800"; d="scan'208";a="114238797" Received: from ppp121-44-3-31.lns4.syd7.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.201]) ([121.44.3.31]) by ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2007 01:28:03 +0930 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4s 4.02 -> 4.03 From: skaller To: Till Varoquaux Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <9d3ec8300707100846i32b2e429w6fa07413041d51df@mail.gmail.com> References: <20070709094028.GB9408@yquem.inria.fr> <20070710113259.GA16672@takhisis.invalid> <20070710121954.GB7621@yquem.inria.fr> <20070710123322.GA20239@takhisis.invalid> <20070710150412.GA23767@yquem.inria.fr> <1184080656.14689.47.camel@rosella.wigram> <9d3ec8300707100846i32b2e429w6fa07413041d51df@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 01:58:02 +1000 Message-Id: <1184083082.14689.77.camel@rosella.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 4693AC8C.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; camlp:01 0200,:01 camlp:01 makefile:01 sourceforge:01 wrote:01 naming:01 caml-list:01 tue:06 john:08 felix:09 felix:09 but:14 solution:14 dislike:14 On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 17:46 +0200, Till Varoquaux wrote: > Another solution, if we want to stick with the possible collisions in > the names (which I personally very much dislike), would be to use a > small program (say "camlp4s-config" to stick with an old C tradition) > that would allow us to query for the naming informations. This would > be far from ideal but would at least allow for portable makefile. And how would you know the name of 'camlp4s-config' ...?? :)) -- John Skaller Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net