From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37333BC6B for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:46:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.135]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l6AGkl5c027357 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:46:49 +0200 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.16,523,1175437800"; d="scan'208";a="114250102" Received: from ppp121-44-3-31.lns4.syd7.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.201]) ([121.44.3.31]) by ipmail03.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2007 02:16:46 +0930 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4s 4.02 -> 4.03 From: skaller To: Till Varoquaux Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <9d3ec8300707100908o67d65c98r131eb75fdf1b10d3@mail.gmail.com> References: <20070709094028.GB9408@yquem.inria.fr> <20070710113259.GA16672@takhisis.invalid> <20070710121954.GB7621@yquem.inria.fr> <20070710123322.GA20239@takhisis.invalid> <20070710150412.GA23767@yquem.inria.fr> <1184080656.14689.47.camel@rosella.wigram> <9d3ec8300707100846i32b2e429w6fa07413041d51df@mail.gmail.com> <1184083082.14689.77.camel@rosella.wigram> <9d3ec8300707100908o67d65c98r131eb75fdf1b10d3@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:46:45 +1000 Message-Id: <1184086005.14689.116.camel@rosella.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4693B7F7.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; camlp:01 0200,:01 camlp:01 sourceforge:01 sourceforge:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 seems:03 seems:03 daniel:04 tue:06 john:08 felix:09 felix:09 On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 18:08 +0200, Till Varoquaux wrote: > On 7/10/07, skaller wrote: > > And how would you know the name of 'camlp4s-config' ...?? :)) > > Well this would have to fixed... Thus you could call camlp4s directly > on your local machine (and Daniel could keep it as camlp4) and > indirectly in the general case (via camlp4s-config). I hope this seems > sensible. It seems to me as a lesser evil compared to the other > propositions. My comment was tongue-in-cheek .. ;) -- John Skaller Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net