From: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Philippe Wang <lists@philippewang.info>
Cc: tmp123@menta.net, ocaml ml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Sorted list
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 23:39:46 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1186234786.32211.7.camel@rosella.wigram> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46B46FB3.3090606@philippewang.info>
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 14:23 +0200, Philippe Wang wrote:
> skaller wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 12:29 +0200, Philippe Wang wrote:
> >
> > You cannot do that! compare function must be a total order.
> >
> Why not ?
> It works ! ... Or did I miss something ?
Yes. Read the manual: the ordered type mandates a total order.
Just because the Ocaml type system is too weak too represent this
constraint does not remove your obligation to meet it.
Whether or not it happens to work with the current implementation
isn't relevant.
--
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-04 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-04 9:35 tmp123
2007-08-04 10:00 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2007-08-04 10:29 ` Philippe Wang
2007-08-04 11:22 ` skaller
2007-08-04 12:23 ` Philippe Wang
2007-08-04 13:39 ` skaller [this message]
2007-08-04 14:01 ` Philippe Wang
2007-08-04 14:45 ` skaller
2007-08-04 14:27 ` tmp123
2007-08-04 20:33 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2007-08-04 14:37 ` tmp123
2007-08-04 15:09 ` Brian Hurt
2007-08-04 15:42 ` skaller
2007-08-04 16:21 ` Richard Jones
2007-08-04 17:17 ` Brian Hurt
2007-08-04 18:24 ` skaller
2007-08-04 17:54 ` skaller
2007-08-04 19:16 ` Richard Jones
2007-08-05 16:22 ` David Allsopp
2007-08-05 16:41 ` Xavier Leroy
2007-08-05 17:01 ` David Allsopp
2007-08-04 17:35 ` Julien Moutinho
2007-08-04 18:04 ` skaller
2007-08-05 1:47 ` Jon Harrop
2007-08-05 11:44 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2007-08-05 12:03 ` Jacques GARRIGUE
2007-08-05 12:31 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2007-08-05 13:22 ` Richard Jones
2007-08-05 20:47 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2007-08-05 13:17 ` Richard Jones
2007-08-05 16:26 ` Xavier Leroy
2007-08-05 23:47 ` skaller
2007-08-04 15:36 ` skaller
2007-08-04 15:17 ` tmp123
2007-08-12 12:05 ` Andrej Bauer
2007-08-04 12:15 ` Brian Hurt
2007-08-04 12:36 ` Brian Hurt
2007-08-04 13:49 ` skaller
2007-08-04 12:16 ` Daniel Bünzli
2007-08-04 12:58 ` Oliver Bandel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1186234786.32211.7.camel@rosella.wigram \
--to=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=lists@philippewang.info \
--cc=tmp123@menta.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).