From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467FCBC69 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 03:07:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.140]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l7F17jLg006256 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 03:07:47 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAFbuwUZ5LGJp/2dsb2JhbAAN X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.19,262,1183300200"; d="scan'208";a="172751698" Received: from ppp121-44-98-105.lns10.syd6.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.201]) ([121.44.98.105]) by ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 15 Aug 2007 10:37:18 +0930 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Utilizing more than 4GB of memory in caml? From: skaller To: Lionel Elie Mamane Cc: "Koprowski, A." , caml-list@yquem.inria.fr, Richard Jones In-Reply-To: <20070814165316.GA14379@capsaicin.mamane.lu> References: <20070814143423.GA29829@capsaicin.mamane.lu> <20070814161741.GA8221@capsaicin.mamane.lu> <20070814162559.GB1651@furbychan.cocan.org> <20070814165316.GA14379@capsaicin.mamane.lu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:07:14 +1000 Message-Id: <1187140034.6101.3.camel@rosella.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 46C251E1.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; 0200,:01 0200,:01 elephant:98 sourceforge:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 caml:02 utilizing:96 86,:04 dec:05 tue:06 tue:06 lionel:07 indeed:07 On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 18:53 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 06:28:38PM +0200, Koprowski, A. wrote: > > > Thank you so much for your detailed instructions and help! And > > indeed you are completely right, it's not a x86, I don't know what > > led me to believe it was. > > Oh, now you got me all curious. What architecture is it then? Sparc, > maybe? My bets on the Elephant are to "DEC Alpha" -- John Skaller Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net