From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5591DBC6C for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:23:02 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAIYw+kbAXQImh2dsb2JhbACOLwEBAQgKJw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,198,1188770400"; d="scan'208";a="16826368" Received: from discorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.38]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2007 19:23:02 +0200 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l8QHN1TL005890 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:23:01 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAIYw+kbLENaMnmdsb2JhbACOLwEBAQEHBAYFChg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,198,1188770400"; d="scan'208";a="3292764" Received: from ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net ([203.16.214.140]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2007 19:22:59 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAIYw+kZ5LHvc/2dsb2JhbAAM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,198,1188743400"; d="scan'208";a="198166075" Received: from ppp121-44-123-220.lns10.syd6.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.201]) ([121.44.123.220]) by ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2007 02:52:50 +0930 Subject: Re: Cherry-picking modules (was Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] OCaml Reins 0.1 - Persistent Data Structure Library) From: skaller To: Michael Furr Cc: caml-list List In-Reply-To: References: <46F95938.7030107@cs.umd.edu> <17487E59-04F2-4509-87B5-24377B051E9E@epfl.ch> <46F961E5.5060302@cs.umd.edu> <55A4E82E-3D05-4F79-A8A6-A87905EB4FC8@epfl.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 03:22:49 +1000 Message-Id: <1190827369.14453.42.camel@rosella.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 46FA9575.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 2007,:98 sourceforge:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 data:02 modules:02 tree:02 binary:02 binary:02 library:03 daniel:04 perhaps:05 On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 11:32 -0400, Michael Furr wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Daniel Bünzli wrote: > I think you need to separate who are *developers* and who are > *users*. > Users are those which you should not depend on having an OCaml > development > environment intalled. This could be users of a stand-alone app, or > perhaps coders using felix. When you distribute your software to > them, it > will be in binary form, and you should take care to ensure this is as > easy > as possible (especially if you're on a platform like windows). > However, > this does not require you to keep them in your own source tree. But it isn't: Felix is distributed as source code. Only in special cases such as Debian-Linux are binary package made available. [Thanks Mike!] -- John Skaller Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net