From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC23BC69 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:18:05 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAM7RGkfLENaMnmdsb2JhbACOVwEBAQEHBAYRGA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,306,1188770400"; d="scan'208";a="4906912" Received: from ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net ([203.16.214.140]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2007 13:18:03 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAABPSGkd5LCRsWmdsb2JhbAAMjkEBIA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,306,1188743400"; d="scan'208";a="215322842" Received: from ppp121-44-36-108.lns10.syd7.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.201]) ([121.44.36.108]) by ipmail01.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2007 20:47:59 +0930 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Help me find this pdf From: skaller To: Tom Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: References: <4718C3AA.9050503@fischerventure.com> <4234F84D-BEC4-4850-B051-D38E8EA38918@mpi-sws.mpg.de> <200710200010.53630.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <1192842817.14120.17.camel@rosella.wigram> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:17:59 +1000 Message-Id: <1192965479.8613.13.camel@rosella.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; 0200,:01 2007,:98 sourceforge:01 sourceforge:01 imho:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 static:03 john:08 felix:09 felix:09 analysis:11 mlton:13 U4:82 On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 08:36 +0200, Tom wrote: > On 20/10/2007, skaller wrote: > > IMHO its about time this rubbish was eliminated. > Static linkers are a legacy technology from the '70s. > > > Is there an alternative? Of course: whole program analysis as in Felix and MLton. -- John Skaller Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net