* Camlp4 optional arguments
@ 2007-12-17 9:16 SerP
2007-12-17 11:03 ` [Caml-list] " Nicolas Pouillard
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: SerP @ 2007-12-17 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Caml-list, caml-list-bounces
USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.2.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on luckytravels.com
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/533/Sat Oct 16 21:09:44 2004
clamav-milter version 0.80j
on luckytravels.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
|This construction does not work properly.
let label = "foo" in
<:ctyp< ? $lid:label$ : int -> () >> |: optional label type.
But this, work fine:
<:ctyp<?foo:int -> ()>>
How I can use antiqoutation in this expression?
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4 optional arguments
2007-12-17 9:16 Camlp4 optional arguments SerP
@ 2007-12-17 11:03 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2007-12-17 11:50 ` SerP
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Pouillard @ 2007-12-17 11:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: SerP; +Cc: caml-list, caml-list-bounces
Excerpts from SerP's message of Mon Dec 17 10:16:50 +0100 2007:
> |This construction does not work properly.
>
> let label = "foo" in
> <:ctyp< ? $lid:label$ : int -> () >> |: optional label type.
>
> But this, work fine:
> <:ctyp<?foo:int -> ()>>
>
>
> How I can use antiqoutation in this expression?
> Thanks
>
What preprocessor do you use revised syntax, original one?
It seems to be a bug already fixed for the revised syntax, since it works for
me.
--
Nicolas Pouillard aka Ertai
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4 optional arguments
2007-12-17 11:03 ` [Caml-list] " Nicolas Pouillard
@ 2007-12-17 11:50 ` SerP
2007-12-17 11:55 ` Nicolas Pouillard
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: SerP @ 2007-12-17 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Pouillard; +Cc: caml-list, caml-list-bounces
USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.2.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on luckytravels.com
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/533/Sat Oct 16 21:09:44 2004
clamav-milter version 0.80j
on luckytravels.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
> What preprocessor do you use revised syntax, original one?
>
> It seems to be a bug already fixed for the revised syntax, since it works for
> me.
>
>
Thanks, it's really works in revised syntax.
Should I post this bug?
What about a case when we use original syntax ? :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4 optional arguments
2007-12-17 11:50 ` SerP
@ 2007-12-17 11:55 ` Nicolas Pouillard
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Pouillard @ 2007-12-17 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: SerP; +Cc: caml-list, caml-list-bounces
Excerpts from SerP's message of Mon Dec 17 12:50:24 +0100 2007:
> Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
> > What preprocessor do you use revised syntax, original one?
> >
> > It seems to be a bug already fixed for the revised syntax, since it works for
> > me.
> >
> >
> Thanks, it's really works in revised syntax.
If it works for you too in the revised syntax I can deduce that you were
trying the original one ?
> Should I post this bug?
Yes, but it won't be a priority this it becomes a lot more ambiguous in original syntax.
> What about a case when we use original syntax ? :-)
Yes.
--
Nicolas Pouillard aka Ertai
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-17 11:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-12-17 9:16 Camlp4 optional arguments SerP
2007-12-17 11:03 ` [Caml-list] " Nicolas Pouillard
2007-12-17 11:50 ` SerP
2007-12-17 11:55 ` Nicolas Pouillard
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).