From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707D9BC6B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 02:57:04 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAELQmEfAbSoIh2dsb2JhbACQJAEBAQgKKZ5F X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,247,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="7199585" Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 25 Jan 2008 02:57:06 +0100 X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de X-Envelope-To: Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id m0P1v3mc030808 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 02:57:03 +0100 Received: (from www-data@localhost) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m0P1v36T030803 for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 02:57:03 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: einhorn.in-berlin.de: www-data set sender to oliver@first.in-berlin.de using -f Received: from dslb-088-073-098-141.pools.arcor-ip.net (dslb-088-073-098-141.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.73.98.141]) by webmail.in-berlin.de (IMP) with HTTP for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 02:57:03 +0100 Message-ID: <1201226223.479941ef07943@webmail.in-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 02:57:03 +0100 From: Oliver Bandel To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Concatenation of static strings? References: <20080119143259.46752d11.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> <53c655920801190255p71346ac9ka45adf0e1cef2d17@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 X-Spam: no; 0.00; bandel:01 in-berlin:01 bug:01 ocaml:01 toplevel:01 bytecode:01 bug:01 1975:98 oliver:01 oliver:01 caml-list:01 bin:01 strings:01 behaviour:01 caml:02 Zitat von Ashish Agarwal : > I was hoping there would be some follow up discussion on the code > below, but > haven't seen anything yet. [...] I just read your mail... ..and it's late .... chrrzzz... ...but if I'm not completely sleepy this looks like a bug. :-( It behaves like if s would be defined on top of the module, but it is local constructed in the function f. Look sstrange... I have the same behaviour here (Debians OCaml here is 3.09.2, and I have tried with toplevel, bytecode and naticecode). => Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs Ciao, Oliver