From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBEDCBC6C for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:55:06 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAKcuqUfAXQInh2dsb2JhbACQMgEBAQgKKZx/ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,312,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="22289415" Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 06 Feb 2008 12:55:06 +0100 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m16Bt62d018762 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:55:06 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAOMuqUfAbSoIZmdsb2JhbACQJQ0LCiadAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,312,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="8849018" Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 06 Feb 2008 12:55:05 +0100 X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de X-Envelope-To: Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id m16Bt4FV013244 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:55:04 +0100 Received: (from www-data@localhost) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m16Bt4vF013242 for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:55:04 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: einhorn.in-berlin.de: www-data set sender to oliver@first.in-berlin.de using -f Received: from dslb-088-073-095-085.pools.arcor-ip.net (dslb-088-073-095-085.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.73.95.85]) by webmail.in-berlin.de (IMP) with HTTP for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:55:04 +0100 Message-ID: <1202298904.47a9a018998e4@webmail.in-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:55:04 +0100 From: Oliver Bandel To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Now it's faster (addendum to "Performance-question") References: <1202297628.47a99b1c7ec53@webmail.in-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <1202297628.47a99b1c7ec53@webmail.in-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 47A9A01A.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bandel:01 in-berlin:01 ocaml:01 shocking:98 55.:98 ......:98 oliver:01 oliver:01 dataset:01 dataset:01 caml-list:01 functions:01 functions:01 data:02 btw:03 Hello, I should have changed the Subject to: "Shocking Performance!!!" but then possibly the spam-filter would become active ;-) The performance dramatically increased now! I first had about 3min34 on my dataset. After throwing out some of the "^"-using functions, the time was about 1min55. Now, after I threw out the rest of that "^"-stuff (which btw. made more of the catanations then the first thrown out functions, but was not called as often as trhe other functions) I'm under 20 seconds! (17..18 seconds!) That's amazing! :-) Especially, because my dataset is about 300 times bigger than the normal data which the tool will see, I think, it's nice now :-) ......aaaaaaaaand the winneeeeer iiiiis: OCaml !!! :-) Yes, that's coooooool! :) Hurray, party :-) Ciao, Oliver