From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5DBBC6C for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:59:21 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAOutqUfAXQImh2dsb2JhbACQMgEBAQgKKZxW X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,313,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="7013677" Received: from discorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.38]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 06 Feb 2008 21:59:21 +0100 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m16KxKeY022046 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:59:20 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAOutqUfBMVMQk2dsb2JhbACQMgEBAQEHBAYJIJxW X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,313,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="7728120" Received: from minbis.univ-orleans.fr (HELO min.univ-orleans.fr) ([193.49.83.16]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 06 Feb 2008 21:59:18 +0100 Received: from smtps.univ-orleans.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by min.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FBDE12B3EB; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:59:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (lau18-1-82-246-197-195.fbx.proxad.net [82.246.197.195]) by smtps.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A69AC36E5B; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:59:23 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] xmlm and names(paces) From: David Teller To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?B=FCnzli?= Daniel Cc: caml-list List In-Reply-To: <998006DB-6778-42F1-B2F4-31CB5E9AA6A2@erratique.ch> References: <998006DB-6778-42F1-B2F4-31CB5E9AA6A2@erratique.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:59:17 +0100 Message-Id: <1202331557.6452.12.camel@Blefuscu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 47AA1FA8.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; univ-orleans:01 ad-hoc:01 cheers:01 0100,:01 univ-orleans:01 lifo:01 liquidations:98 wrote:01 readable:01 caml-list:01 conventions:02 daniel:04 distributed:05 i'd:06 wed:06 As far as I know, the only difference is when you try and produce human-readable XML documents. In this case, there are often ad-hoc conventions regarding which prefix maps to what namespace (e.g. for the same namespace, xhtml: is more readable than, say, ns1:) -- which might be useful for people writing, say, editors. There might also be a difference when browsers are attempting to recover broken xml, but that's probably not an issue here. Cheers, David On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 21:44 +0100, Bünzli Daniel wrote: > However maybe I'm missing something so I'd like to ask the list if > someone think there is any use for clients to get qualified names ? If > I you do please tell me. -- David Teller Security of Distributed Systems http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act brings liquidations.