From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ECF5BC6C for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:29:20 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAHcPrUfAXQInh2dsb2JhbACQNgEBCQopl18 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,326,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="8983734" Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2008 11:29:20 +0100 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m19ATJen028949 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:29:19 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAEcPrUfBMVMPk2dsb2JhbACQNgEBAgcEBgkgl10 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,326,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="22427010" Received: from kabis.univ-orleans.fr (HELO ka.univ-orleans.fr) ([193.49.83.15]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2008 11:29:19 +0100 Received: from smtps.univ-orleans.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ka.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0421A12AFD1; Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:29:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (ras75-4-82-235-58-110.fbx.proxad.net [82.235.58.110]) by smtps.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A3E36E5B; Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:29:19 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Now it's faster (addendum to "Performance-question") From: David Teller To: Oliver Bandel Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <1202551380.47ad7a5482948@webmail.in-berlin.de> References: <1202297628.47a99b1c7ec53@webmail.in-berlin.de> <1202298904.47a9a018998e4@webmail.in-berlin.de> <20080206120403.GA5335@snarc.org> <1202378134.6444.1.camel@Blefuscu> <1202551380.47ad7a5482948@webmail.in-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 11:29:16 +0100 Message-Id: <1202552956.6843.1.camel@Blefuscu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 47AD807F.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; univ-orleans:01 buffer:01 cheers:01 0100,:01 bandel:01 buffer:01 univ-orleans:01 lifo:01 liquidations:98 imho:01 wrote:01 oliver:01 caml-list:01 implemented:02 module:03 I was answering Vincent Hanquez who seemed to have ideas wrt Buffer. Cheers, David On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 11:03 +0100, Oliver Bandel wrote: > Do you mean the buffer module should be made better or do you think, > the "^" operator should be implemented differently? > If Buffer-module might be even faster, when it's changed, > that's fine, but IMHO it's quite fast. -- David Teller Security of Distributed Systems http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act brings liquidations.