From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB656BBC1 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:58:44 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAOqGskfAXQInh2dsb2JhbACQPQEBAQgKKZxN X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,346,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="9141878" Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2008 14:58:44 +0100 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m1DDwgTY016423 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:58:44 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAHOGskfBMVMPk2dsb2JhbACQPQEBAQEHBAYJIJxN X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,346,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="22583297" Received: from kabis.univ-orleans.fr (HELO ka.univ-orleans.fr) ([193.49.83.15]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2008 14:58:44 +0100 Received: from smtps.univ-orleans.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ka.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B3D12B185; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:58:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from [193.49.89.10] (delta.univ-orleans.fr [193.49.89.10]) by smtps.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007B336E5B; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:58:41 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: [OSR] Ports-like package management system From: David Teller To: Sylvain Le Gall Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: References: <479F0664.2070706@exalead.com> <1202892353.6427.4.camel@Blefuscu> <1202904809.6116.8.camel@Blefuscu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:58:31 +0100 Message-Id: <1202911111.6116.10.camel@Blefuscu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 47B2F792.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; univ-orleans:01 cheers:01 univ-orleans:01 lifo:01 liquidations:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 organized:02 archives:02 tgz:02 distributed:05 innocuous:05 wed:06 indeed:07 sufficient:08 On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 13:48 +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: > Indeed, this could be. But what i call "ocaml-archives" won't be > ocamlbuild related. It will just be archives organized such as that > making possible to use them in an automated way. > > Regards, > Sylvain Le Gall Unless I'm mistaken, this "use_tgz" tag would be sufficient to start and would be innocuous enough that it wouldn't get in the way of ocaml-archives, whenever their format gets specified, wouldn't it ? Cheers, David -- David Teller Security of Distributed Systems http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act brings liquidations.