From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA22BBCA for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:45:12 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAPd2xUfUGyojkWdsb2JhbACQaAEBAQEHAggJCBidLw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,416,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="23133159" Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.35]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2008 23:45:12 +0100 Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487833B6D59; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:12:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.63] (ron34-3-82-236-236-194.fbx.proxad.net [82.236.236.194]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF68438705B; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:07:32 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Categories for types From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?= To: Gabriel Kerneis Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: <20080227143844.664f0a04@tatanka.kerneis.info> References: <1204103280.10964.16.camel@Llea.celt.neu> <20080227143844.664f0a04@tatanka.kerneis.info> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:08:07 +0100 Message-Id: <1204142887.1724.1.camel@Llea.celt.neu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; 0100,:01 0100,:01 functors:01 functors:01 ocaml:01 caml-list:01 functions:01 modules:02 checking:02 types:05 ecrit:06 ecrit:06 wed:06 michael:07 michael:07 Le Mercredi 27 février 2008 à 14:38 +0100, Gabriel Kerneis a écrit : > Hello, > > Le Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:08:00 +0100, Michaël Grünewald > a écrit : > > Before checking > > the book out, I would like to know if the term ``functor'' was chosen > > because they are actually functors. > > No. > > Functors (in Ocaml) are just functions that produce modules. Concise and precise answer! :) Thank you, MG