From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <David.Teller@univ-orleans.fr>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81D3BBC1
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:59:12 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AggBABJa1UfBMVMPk2dsb2JhbACRAgEBAQEHBAYJIJlB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,476,1199660400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="10109217"
Received: from kabis.univ-orleans.fr (HELO ka.univ-orleans.fr) ([193.49.83.15])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2008 23:59:12 +0100
Received: from smtps.univ-orleans.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ka.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5746D12AD5E; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:59:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.0.1] (lau18-1-82-246-197-195.fbx.proxad.net [82.246.197.195])
	by smtps.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF0136E5B;
	Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:59:16 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Type manifest
From: David Teller <David.Teller@univ-orleans.fr>
To: Olivier Andrieu <oandrieu@nerim.net>
Cc: Caml <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <95513600803101551h536349f8s64478ea3c04a814b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1205188265.6612.24.camel@Blefuscu>
	 <95513600803101551h536349f8s64478ea3c04a814b@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:59:11 +0100
Message-Id: <1205189951.6612.27.camel@Blefuscu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam: no; 0.00; univ-orleans:01 cheers:01 0100,:01 andrieu:01 univ-orleans:01 lifo:01 liquidations:98 wrote:01 abstract:01 caml-list:01 equation:02 float:03 float:03 manifest:03 complex:05 

Thanks. And what exactly is the point of that ? Making an abstract type
concrete ?

Cheers,
 David

On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 23:51 +0100, Olivier Andrieu wrote:
> I believe that's for type definitions with both an equation and a
> representation, like:
> 
>   type complex = Complex.t = {
>     re : float ;
>     im : float ;
>   }
> 
-- 
David Teller
 Security of Distributed Systems
  http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller
 Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act brings liquidations.