From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A45D4BBC1 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:31:04 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtQCAJiWEUjCpx6wiGdsb2JhbACRWwEBAQ8gmjo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,707,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="11929784" Received: from smtpmin.univ-orleans.fr (HELO min.univ-orleans.fr) ([194.167.30.176]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 25 Apr 2008 17:31:04 +0200 Received: from smtps.univ-orleans.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by min.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58BAF12B3E1; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:31:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.108] (APoitiers-256-1-82-157.w90-11.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.11.21.157]) by smtps.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED82E36E5B; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:31:06 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Standard syntax extensions ? From: David Teller To: Jon Harrop Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: <200804241802.19074.jon@ffconsultancy.com> References: <1209052182.6180.35.camel@Blefuscu> <200804241802.19074.jon@ffconsultancy.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:32:19 +0200 Message-Id: <1209137539.6192.36.camel@Blefuscu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; syntax:01 univ-orleans:01 patching:01 compiler:01 camlp:01 cheers:01 0100,:01 compiler:01 camlp:01 univ-orleans:01 lifo:01 edgar:98 liquidations:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 If you want to work on patching the compiler itself, please get in touch with Edgar Friendly. He's getting some work done on that side. I'm more interested in libraries and camlp4. Cheers, David On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 18:02 +0100, Jon Harrop wrote: > Agreed. There are some glaring omissions, like try..finally, but they should > be fixed properly in the compiler and not using camlp macros. > -- David Teller Security of Distributed Systems http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act brings liquidations.