From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E5CBB84 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:15:36 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAICffUjAXQIm/2dsb2JhbACwdA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.30,373,1212357600"; d="scan'208";a="13167296" Received: from discorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.38]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2008 16:15:36 +0200 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m6GEFZfl004130 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:15:35 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkQDAFOefUjIuX5BiGdsb2JhbACSPQEBAQ8gngY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.30,373,1212357600"; d="scan'208";a="27378693" Received: from mta18.f3.k8.com.br ([200.185.126.65]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2008 16:15:33 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpa.f3.k8.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4BE280016F; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:15:30 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at k8.com.br Received: from smtpa.f3.k8.com.br ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta18.f3.k8.com.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id jDoQTHbqE3D4; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:15:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [10.7.5.105] (fosforo.k8.com.br [200.185.109.125]) by smtpa.f3.k8.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBBF42800168; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:15:29 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Another question about modules From: Andre Nathan To: Martin Jambon Cc: Ashish Agarwal , caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: References: <1216154495.5294.9.camel@homesick> <1216162299.5294.22.camel@homesick> <1216169075.5294.32.camel@homesick> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:15:41 -0300 Message-Id: <1216217741.7267.4.camel@andre.mz.digirati.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 487E0287.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; 0200,:01 translating:01 ocaml:01 mismatch:01 ocaml:01 nathan:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 jambon:01 modules:02 objects:02 redesign:05 wed:06 translation:07 written:07 On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 03:54 +0200, Martin Jambon wrote: > I hope you'll find this useful > :-) It was, thanks :) I am translating this code to ocaml, and the original version is written in an object-oriented fashion, so there's naturally an impedance mismatch on the translation... I'll wait a bit to decide if I should use objects in ocaml or if it's better to try to redesign the code to make it more... ocamly :p Thanks again, Andre