From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA40BBAF for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:24:52 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiUEANylwEjCpx6vamdsb2JhbACSNw0FCAYSpEOBZQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,320,1217800800"; d="scan'208";a="16862892" Received: from smtpka.univ-orleans.fr (HELO ka.univ-orleans.fr) ([194.167.30.175]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 05 Sep 2008 12:24:52 +0200 Received: from smtps.univ-orleans.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ka.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5112B12AD68 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:24:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (ras75-4-82-235-58-110.fbx.proxad.net [82.235.58.110]) by smtps.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9478C36E60 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:24:53 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Two questions on OCamlDoc From: David Teller To: Caml In-Reply-To: <1220356028.6406.33.camel@Blefuscu> References: <1220356028.6406.33.camel@Blefuscu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:25:03 +0200 Message-Id: <1220610303.8100.16.camel@Blefuscu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocamldoc:01 univ-orleans:01 maxence:01 mli:01 0200,:01 toying:01 ocamldoc:01 inlining:01 univ-orleans:01 lifo:01 liquidations:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 modules:02 modules:02 Okay, I've found the solution to most of my problems, thanks to Maxence. The code will be committed soon to the Batteries repository if anyone is interested. I have one more question, though: assuming that I have a reference to a [t_module] for a module with both a [.mli] and a [.ml], is there a simple way to access the underlying implementation without having to reparse [m_code]? Thanks, David On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 13:47 +0200, David Teller wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm currently toying with OCamlDoc, with very little success. I'm > attempting to do two things: > * getting OCamlDoc to understand that some modules (which I can modify) > contain the documentation for some other modules (which I can't) replace > some modules with others > * inlining the documentation for modules in modules which import those. -- David Teller-Rajchenbach Security of Distributed Systems http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act brings liquidations.