Re: [Caml-list] Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included

[David Teller <David.Teller@univ-orleans.fr>]

     Hi Benedikt,

 You're right, we should make this kind of decision. For the moment, we
are focusing on different issues (e.g. standardising I/O, enumerations,
module names, etc), in an effort to obtain a base relatively fast,
something which could be tested both with existing code and new
applications. It is our hope that this will yield enough interest for
people to comment and discuss policies regarding exceptions, labels,
etc.

Cheers,
 David

On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 11:00 +0000, Benedikt Grundmann wrote:
> Somehow I forgot reply back when you posted this reply.  And I was just
> reminded when I read this:
> 
> "Batteries is meant to serve the following purposes:
>  [snip]
> provide consistent abstractions and APIs for otherwise independent libraries.
> "
> 
> on
> 
> http://wiki.cocan.org/events/europe/ocamlmeetinggrenoble2009
> 
> How can you expect to provide consistent abstractions if you are
> not willing to make those decisions?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Bene

-- 
David Teller-Rajchenbach
 Security of Distributed Systems
  http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller
   Latest News of French Research: System being liquidated. Researchers
angry.