From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00DF0BB84 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:02:39 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,262,1231110000"; d="scan'208";a="19568808" Received: from discorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.38]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2009 09:02:39 +0100 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n0E82d0K021619 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:02:39 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApYDAEArbUnRVdoecmdsb2JhbACTWj4BDAoJCQ+qIoEDjXMBAwEDhWw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,262,1231110000"; d="scan'208";a="19568807" Received: from mail-bw0-f30.google.com ([209.85.218.30]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2009 09:02:39 +0100 Received: by bwz11 with SMTP id 11so219023bwz.9 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:02:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:content-type :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7/DechoOrr7PEj7bnV01brtPTV2YfesNS+X44JD0XEY=; b=FqDGIU2VWO73egG/3H606BCrUN2cx+niCaI6L9iWyxY2gB5kbukKK6d5PyESfiKW1j Po+oH19zoarLGr8MwTpwHnfJ2u2UKS9bOUDm5V2wpIutxcsIdnNkj8efYs0al7t7rUm5 c7FrAYVDzjihsg4auytLekz12mB4eA22az2Fc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; b=A230AxU415s86rcUwYr3aRQ5YfBU+BAR7xN6DY9aVHuBcpQ4rQBupIdDV1OrIuCxRZ teQqhUfckGz7Q5zUUUWgSbmKsr4dBfwrpLtN5XqyJoHJ/msvi7OEeJ6CGvBvxitbamFh tkNopfAcjtvF1kk7iFjMkIayACpeRrPdkCB2U= Received: by 10.86.82.6 with SMTP id f6mr470448fgb.42.1231920158739; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:02:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.21.130? ([91.202.164.106]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d6sm2847198fga.40.2009.01.14.00.02.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:02:38 -0800 (PST) Subject: why Hashtbl.t are not covarint? From: Radzevich Belevich To: Caml List Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:02:25 +0300 Message-Id: <1231920145.2711.8.camel@serphost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 496D9C1F.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; hashtbl:01 hashtbl:01 mli:01 type:14 type:14 why:24 why:24 com:74 are:33 not:47 not:47 gmail:48 hashtbl.mli: type ('a,'b) t Why not "type ('a,+'b) t"?