From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD8DBB84 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:05:08 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsBAGSIkUnCpx6wmWdsb2JhbACUSQEBAQEBCAsKBxG/BIQaBg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,188,1233529200"; d="scan'208";a="20921796" Received: from smtpmin.univ-orleans.fr (HELO min.univ-orleans.fr) ([194.167.30.176]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 10 Feb 2009 23:05:08 +0100 Received: from smtps.univ-orleans.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by min.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E5312B544; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:05:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (lau18-1-82-246-197-195.fbx.proxad.net [82.246.197.195]) by smtps.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1BBF36E60; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:05:11 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Behavior of camlp4o when used with -pp? From: David Rajchenbach-Teller To: Jake Donham Cc: OCaml In-Reply-To: References: <1234297248.6457.65.camel@Blefuscu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:05:20 +0100 Message-Id: <1234303520.6457.73.camel@Blefuscu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; camlp:01 -pp:01 ens-lyon:01 camlp:01 bug:01 -pp:01 ocaml:01 univ-orleans:01 lifo:01 2009:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 distributed:05 tue:06 chercheur:07 Well, in that case, it's an attempt to work around a camlp4 bug. And I'm not attempting to use -no_comments itself, it's just the shortest example I could find of the behavior. Thanks, David On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 13:10 -0800, Jake Donham wrote: > Basically there is no reason to use -no_comments with -pp. But if you > really want to you can also give -printer o to camlp4o so you always > get the OCaml printer instead of autoselecting. > > Jake > -- David Teller-Rajchenbach Security of Distributed Systems http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller « Ce matin Un crétin A tué un chercheur. » (air connu) Latest News of French Research: System being liquidated. Researchers angry.