From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0C3BBAF for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:58:14 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtwDAGTdy0nIuX5CgWdsb2JhbACWAAEBFiK7M4N3Bg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,430,1233529200"; d="scan'208";a="26419744" Received: from mta19.f3.k8.com.br ([200.185.126.66]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 27 Mar 2009 03:58:13 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpa.f3.k8.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF0B28000A8; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:58:11 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at k8.com.br Received: from smtpa.f3.k8.com.br ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta19.f3.k8.com.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ZEhQun+z-Z7N; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:58:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [189.106.1.98] (unknown [189.106.1.98]) by smtpa.f3.k8.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9FC280009A; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:58:09 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Toplevel with camlp4 From: Andre Nathan To: peng.zang@gmail.com Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr, caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <200903262215.35389.peng.zang@gmail.com> References: <1238119160.6000.7.camel@homesick> <200903262215.35389.peng.zang@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:02:37 -0300 Message-Id: <1238122957.6000.12.camel@homesick> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; toplevel:01 camlp:01 ocaml:01 bug:01 descriptors:01 nathan:98 2009:98 peng:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 let:03 thu:05 recall:10 file:11 andre:11 On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 22:15 -0400, Peng Zang wrote: > Are you using OCaml 3.10? I recall there's a bug that doesn't let you #use > more than once due to bad file descriptors. It's been fixed in 3.11 That was it. Thanks! Andre