From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C849ABC37 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:10:01 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiADAO/iMUrCpx6vj2dsb2JhbACYQQEBAQEJCwgbtwKECwU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,209,1243807200"; d="scan'208";a="31104141" Received: from smtpka.univ-orleans.fr (HELO ka.univ-orleans.fr) ([194.167.30.175]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 12 Jun 2009 14:10:01 +0200 Received: from smtps.univ-orleans.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ka.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5282112AD5B; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:10:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (82-41-65-191.cable.ubr09.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.65.191]) by smtps.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FD736E60; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:10:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Batteries and portability From: David Rajchenbach-Teller To: David MENTRE Cc: Edgar Friendly , Tiphaine Turpin , caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: <3d13dcfc0906110842l7525b0b7uf78bbc41b6609fb2@mail.gmail.com> References: <4A30CD39.1010804@irisa.fr> <4A311067.5010905@gmail.com> <3d13dcfc0906110842l7525b0b7uf78bbc41b6609fb2@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:09:59 +0100 Message-Id: <1244808599.6987.39.camel@Blefuscu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; ens-lyon:01 cheers:01 0200,:01 ocaml:01 2009:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 strings:01 portability:02 binary:02 module:03 compiled:04 fix:05 thu:05 break:08 We could try that, but that looks to me like something that would break more things than it would fix. Cheers, David On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 17:42 +0200, David MENTRE wrote: > Wouldn't it be possible to convert those files into OCaml strings and > use them instead? They would be included in the compiled module but > not incorporated in the final binary except if needed. > > Yours, > david