From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <andre@digirati.com.br>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E50BC37
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:15:58 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhQFAIOriUrIuX5EYWdsb2JhbACaeCIhunWEGQWFcw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,399,1246831200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="44777742"
Received: from mta21.f3.k8.com.br ([200.185.126.68])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 18 Aug 2009 04:15:57 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtpa.f3.k8.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A95B280008D;
	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:15:53 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at k8.com.br
Received: from smtpa.f3.k8.com.br ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (mta21.f3.k8.com.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id yJR+Mn0IM8ck; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:15:53 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [189.106.92.151] (unknown [189.106.92.151])
	by smtpa.f3.k8.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A792800088;
	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:15:51 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Conditional compilation
From: Andre Nathan <andre@digirati.com.br>
To: Edgar Friendly <thelema314@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
In-Reply-To: <4A8A0B3C.10504@gmail.com>
References: <4A8A0B3C.10504@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:26:52 -0300
Message-Id: <1250562412.6289.8.camel@homesick>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam: no; 0.00; compilation:01 ifdef:01 foo:01 -pp:01 camlp:01 camlp:01 cmo:01 foo:01 ifdef:01 nathan:98 2009:98 edgar:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 conditional:04 

On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 22:00 -0400, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> Is there a better way to do this?  The path I'm following is looking
> very byzantine compared to C's [-DFOO] + [#ifdef FOO].

In ospec I use

  -pp "camlp4o Camlp4MacroParser.cmo -D FOO"

which can then be tested in the code with

IFDEF FOO THEN
  ...
END


HTH,
Andre