From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0602FBC37 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 10:59:51 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtMBAKvFoUrCpx6wmWdsb2JhbACQDYsuAQEBAQEICwoHE7xohBcF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,336,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="46059499" Received: from smtpmin.univ-orleans.fr (HELO min.univ-orleans.fr) ([194.167.30.176]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 05 Sep 2009 10:59:50 +0200 Received: from smtps.univ-orleans.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by min.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CECA112B64C; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 10:59:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.11.18] (unknown [212.219.59.79]) by smtps.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36DE736E60; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 10:59:47 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why don't you use batteries? From: David Rajchenbach-Teller To: kattla Cc: Edgar Friendly , caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: <6ebe51ce0909030710j65c3900cr31d7ca836fe7d46c@mail.gmail.com> References: <4A9FBF04.1060608@gmail.com> <6ebe51ce0909030710j65c3900cr31d7ca836fe7d46c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 09:59:45 +0100 Message-Id: <1252141185.3988.21.camel@Blefuscu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; ens-lyon:01 compiler:01 cheers:01 0200,:01 beginner's:01 ocaml:01 bug:01 2009:98 beginners:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 caml-list:01 executables:01 executables:01 bin:01 Unfortunately, it still is. I hope that the compiler will eventually be fixed to avoid this kind of issue. Cheers, David On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 16:10 +0200, kattla wrote: > Hi, > > > 3) It makes my executables too big > > (Assuming this [0] is still true) > > For me this is the biggest reason for not using batteries. I don't > really have a need for small executables right now, but I would like > to at least know that this issue will be resolved before I adopt > batteries. > > > [0] http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2008/11/24509ad16aae6d1cc2e15f532e0007eb.en.html > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >