From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rixed@happyleptic.org>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 236227ED5C
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Tue,  7 Aug 2012 03:35:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  rixed@happyleptic.org) identity=pra; client-ip=212.27.42.6;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-sender="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  rixed@happyleptic.org) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=212.27.42.6;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-sender="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@smtp6-g21.free.fr) identity=helo;
  client-ip=212.27.42.6;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-sender="postmaster@smtp6-g21.free.fr";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AksEAGxvIFDUGyoGlGdsb2JhbABFhXuyTQSBBSIBAQEBCQsJCRQDJIIhAQUjZgsaAhkNAgJXiCqoQpMhgSGKX4MbggqBEgObJI0S
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,723,1336341600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="152566472"
Received: from smtp6-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.6])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 07 Aug 2012 03:35:09 +0200
Received: from [10.3.197.56] (unknown [78.250.241.204])
	by smtp6-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C5C82211
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue,  7 Aug 2012 03:35:04 +0200 (CEST)
From: Cedric Cellier <rixed@happyleptic.org>
Reply-To: Cedric Cellier <rixed@happyleptic.org>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
X-Mailer: Modest 3.2
References:
	 <CAMT7qiTJD4hFd4Jr0tKCzhmR=ngN0yV9Pw6CCgEfRPP6a6DYvg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <501F9855.6080709@frisch.fr>
	 <CAMT7qiTCnxbAwbPSiXxxm3EBFVyTad98YqxxxveoPkhepKbCkA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <501F9DB9.2050805@frisch.fr>
	 <CAMT7qiR=7LS3211gkA2HOVwB+BQj81cs1efjy3eBESgqW03s5g@mail.gmail.com>
	  <501FAB4A.107@frisch.fr>
In-Reply-To: <501FAB4A.107@frisch.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-ID: <1344303303.7995.4.camel@Nokia-N900>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 03:35:03 +0200
Message-Id: <1344303303.7995.5.camel@Nokia-N900>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Compiler bug?


----- Message d'origine -----
> > ; Save all regs used by the code generator
> No, this code does not preserves registers.

So you suggest this comment is a little misleading? :p