AW: [Caml-list] Why are modules handled differently by the interpreter and the compiler

[Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>]

Cool. I suggest you submit this as a patch.

One minor error, though: In case of an exception Toploop.parse_use_file  
should also be reset.

Gerd

Am 05.11.2012 03:30:55 schrieb(en) Grégoire Henry:
> > What could be implemented as an extension is a #use_as_module
> > directive that adds the implicit module. This could be in deed
> > useful for debugging, especially when it overlooks the mli file if
> > present - if you #load, the definition hiding of the mli file takes
> > place, and you cannot see unexported definitions anymore. Of course,
> > this is sometimes in the way when you test things out.
> >
> > Now that compiler-libs is installed this extension could probably
> > even be implemented outside the compiler. Anyone up for it?
> 
> Well, here it is:
> 
>   $ ocamlmktop -o myocaml mod_use.ml
>   $ cat test.ml
>   let x = 53
>   $ ./myocaml
>         OCaml version 4.00.1
> 
>   # #mod_use "test.ml";;
>   module Test : sig val x : int end
>   # Test.x;;
>   - : int = 53
> 
> Regards,
> Grégoire
> 
> --
> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gerd Stolpmann, Darmstadt, Germany    gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de
Creator of GODI and camlcity.org.
Contact details:        http://www.camlcity.org/contact.html
Company homepage:       http://www.gerd-stolpmann.de
------------------------------------------------------------