From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <marco-oweber@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8164881792
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 03:11:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  marco-oweber@gmx.de) identity=pra; client-ip=212.227.17.22;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="marco-oweber@gmx.de";
  x-sender="marco-oweber@gmx.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  marco-oweber@gmx.de designates 212.227.17.22 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=212.227.17.22;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="marco-oweber@gmx.de";
  x-sender="marco-oweber@gmx.de";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mout.gmx.net) identity=helo;
  client-ip=212.227.17.22;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="marco-oweber@gmx.de";
  x-sender="postmaster@mout.gmx.net";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlsBAFXtyFHU4xEWm2dsb2JhbABagzqDTqtpkEiBCxYOAQEBAQEGCwsJFCiCJAEFIw8BVgsaAhgBDQICEEcGiA4BFp4Ci0OIFQGJKYEmjjCCT4EUA5hshQeOJg
X-IPAS-Result: AlsBAFXtyFHU4xEWm2dsb2JhbABagzqDTqtpkEiBCxYOAQEBAQEGCwsJFCiCJAEFIw8BVgsaAhgBDQICEEcGiA4BFp4Ci0OIFQGJKYEmjjCCT4EUA5hshQeOJg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,932,1363129200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="23181264"
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 25 Jun 2013 03:11:54 +0200
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.16]) by mrigmx.server.lan
 (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Lobhc-1UKhvf16hW-00gXKa for
 <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 03:11:53 +0200
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2013 01:11:52 -0000
Received: from p5DD8C4BF.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO mail.gmx.net) [93.216.196.191]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 25 Jun 2013 03:11:52 +0200
X-Authenticated: #9006135
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18VWskzF0wVapVphgYLNCXpYhI+b5zRC9BQoHlUp7
	5RGuo38z9Xq6Ml
Received: by mail.gmx.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:12:19 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From: Marc Weber <marco-oweber@gmx.de>
To: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
In-reply-to: <1372089559-sup-2177@nixos>
References: <1372089559-sup-2177@nixos>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 03:12:19 +0200
Message-Id: <1372121389-sup-800@nixos>
User-Agent: Sup/git
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Subject: [Caml-list] Re: ocamlopt vs camlc, different behaviour - how to
 track down?

Adopting the code at Camlp4Profiler (which ships with ocaml) seems
to do what I want.

trace: trace.ml
	ocamlc -dtypes -pp 'camlp4r -I +camlp4 -parser Camlp4QuotationCommon  -parser Camlp4QuotationExpander' -I +camlp4 -o $@ -c $<

Marc Weber