From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0467FBC69 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 07:44:13 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAAYFRkfYi+yen2dsb2JhbACPNgEBAQEHBAYJCBg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,455,1188770400"; d="scan'208";a="4813126" Received: from kuber.nabble.com ([216.139.236.158]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 23 Nov 2007 07:44:12 +0100 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IvSGo-0007HY-L2 for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:44:10 -0800 Message-ID: <13907602.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:44:10 -0800 (PST) From: Mike Hogan To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml on Sony PS3 (was Re: More registers in modern day CPUs) In-Reply-To: <20071121172049.GB17695@furbychan.cocan.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: MikeHogan62@gmail.com References: <875c7e070709060755r1d0d099ds30a25ea78d0fd85a@mail.gmail.com> <46E01A27.1070207@janestcapital.com> <509223F0BF55E74FA1247D17207E7A0C01D75893@orsmsx419.amr.corp.intel.com> <87r6lb90tw.fsf@linux-france.org> <46E046DF.5010103@univ-savoie.fr> <46E04B85.1020004@naughtydog.com> <13858952.post@talk.nabble.com> <20071121172049.GB17695@furbychan.cocan.org> X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocamlopt:01 ocaml:01 compiler:01 beginner's:01 bug:01 sony:98 20,:98 dog:98 beginners:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 caml-list:01 bin:01 Ok, it's 3.10.0 When I did ./configure -host powerpc-ydl-linux the resulting report seemed to suggest that it was going to build native 32-bit, but native tools like ocamlopt were not present post-build. At this point I'm too inexperienced to unravel the mysteries behind the less-than-ideal result. Richard Jones-4 wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 07:32:34AM -0800, Mike Hogan wrote: >> I have recently compiled OCaml 3.10 for the PS3 running Yellow Dog Linux. >> Seems to work fine, but I haven't tested it rigorously (and at this >> point, I >> wouldn't even know how to test it ... um ...what's the opposite of >> "rigorously"? ... non-rigorously?) > > Native compiler? 64 bits?? Which version of OCaml??? > > Rich. > > -- > Richard Jones > Red Hat > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/More-registers-in-modern-day-CPUs-tf4389938.html#a13907602 Sent from the Caml Discuss2 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.